IELTS Writing Task 2 là phần thi thứ hai của bài thI IELTS WRITING học thuật (IELTS Academic Writing Test). Đối với Task 2, bạn cần viết một bài luận có độ dài ít nhất là 250 từ trong vòng 40 phút. Điểm thi của phần thi task 2 sẽ chiếm 2/3 tổng số điểm của phần thi Writing.
Về chủ đề cũng như các câu hỏi liên quan thường cập nhật và xoay quanh đến những chủ đề quen thuộc hàng ngày mà mọi người trên thế giới quan tâm. Một trong những chủ đề phổ biến nhất đó chính là chủ đề Education. Hãy cùng IELTS 24h khám phá cấu trúc của 1 bài thi IELTS Writing Task 2 và mẫu bài viết chủ đề Education của thầy Simon nhé
1. Cấu trúc và cách viết IELTS Writing Task 2
1.1. IELTS Writing Task 2 của hình thức Academic và General Training khác nhau như thế nào?
Điểm giống nhau về phần thi Writing task 2 của hình thức Academic và General Training đó chính là viết một bài tiểu luận, bao gồm các dạng bài như: Opinion, Discussion, Advantage/ Disadvantage, Direct Question, Solutions. Còn điểm khá biệt duy nhất là câu hỏi cho phần General Training thường dễ hơn và các chủ đề thường đơn giản hơn.
1.2. Tiêu chí chấm điểm IELTS Writing Task 2
- Task Response (25%): khả năng trả lời vấn đề bài thi đưa ra
- Conhenrence & Conhesion (25%): tính gắn kết và liền mạch của các câu và đoạn văn
- Vocabulary (25%): vốn từ vựng được sử dụng trong bài
- Grammar (25%): biết và sử dụng chính xác các cấu trúc ngữ pháp
1.3. Các bước viết bài thi IELTS Writing Task 2
Bước 1: Phân tích đề
Đầu tiên, các bạn nên dành 1-2 phút để phân tích những yếu tố sau của đề bài:
- Keyword: Từ khóa trong đề bài
- Micro-keyword: Từ khó nhỏ hơn trong đề bài
- Instruction word: Từ khoá chỉ yêu cầu, hướng dẫn của đề bài
Bước 2: Lập dàn ý
Tiếp theo, các bạn nên dành 5-10 phút lập dàn ý cho bài viết của mình. Cách này sẽ giúp các bạn tiết kiệm thời gian làm bài thi và khiến bạn mắc ít lỗi sai hơn khi làm bài bởi bạn đã có đầy đủ ý của bài viết ngay từ đầu, và bạn có thể tập trung hơn vào từ vựng cũng như cấu trúc ngữ pháp.
Bước 3: Viết Introduction
Phần mở đầu của đề bài luôn luôn có hai yếu tố sau:
- Background Sentence (Giới thiệu chủ đề của bài viết): Trong phần này, chúng ta sẽ paraphrase lại đề bài bằng cách thay đổi từ vựng hoặc thay đổi cấu trúc ngữ pháp
- Câu thứ 2 trong phần mở bài sẽ tập trung thẳng vào vấn đề để trả lời câu hỏi ở đề bài và nên có các câu dẫn như: “In my opinion”, “I believe that”, hoặc “In my view”
Bước 4: Viết thân bài
Thông thường hai đoạn thân bài thường được viết bao gồm những ý sau:
- Topic sentence: Câu chủ đề
- Explanation: Giải thích
- Example: Ví dụ cụ thể
Bước 5: Viết Conclusion
Kết bài có nhiệm vụ nhắc lại câu trả lời cho câu hỏi của đề bài. Không nên đưa ra các thông tin mà đề bài không yêu cầu như giải pháp, dự báo,... Những cụm từ báo hiệu kết luận: In conclusion, In sum, To sum up, To summarize, All in all, In a nut shell, In short,...
3. Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Education của thầy Simon
Đề bài 1: Some people consider that history is of little or no use to us. Others believe that studying history helps us to know the present. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.
History refers to all the things that happened in the past, especially the political,social, or economic development of a nation. Literally, everything, including a nation, acity, a town, a subject, a business, and even a product, has its unique history. Someindividuals are of the opinion that studying past history is useless today but othersbelieve it is very essential to know history to better understand the present. I intendto discuss both sides of the argument in this essay.
Undoubtedly, the present is the continuation of the past. Therefore, studying the pasthistory can enable us to better understand what is going on around us. For example, ifwe are equipped with relevant knowledge of history, it will be easier for us tounderstand the evolution of mankind. It would also tell us how we progressed andreached where we are today. We would also know how technology developed step bystep. History can serve us as a guide because of which we do not repeat the mistakesof yesteryears. We also get inspiration from the great men ofthe past through history.Those opposed to the study of history argue that the past was very different from thepresent and we cannot apply that knowledge to the present. For example, they saythat the French Revolution and the freedom struggle of India have no need to belearnt because those situations will never arise again. What they forget is that thisknowledge makes us realise the importance of liberty and self governance.
Opponents of the study of history also claim that history has nothing to do withprofessionals such as architects and accountants. I believe they would be better intheir professions if they
know something about the history of architecture or that ofaccountancy. As a matter of fact, you are supposed to demonstrate some evidence ofhistorical ability if you want to pursue almost any career.
To sum up, studying the past history can not only deepen and widen our knowledgebut also help us develop the power of analysis. Thus, we are able to look at what ishappening at present from a historical perspective and better understanding.
Đề bài 2: Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.
The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.
For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.
Đề bài 3: Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality continuously, students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on teachers. Others think the respect and discipline in the classroom will disappear. Which opinion do you prefer?
Nowadays, in some high schools students are allowed to blame their tutors for their method of teaching. Some say that this strategy can improve the quality of training; however, others, including myself, believe that its advantages outweigh the benefits being earned from this system because teaching will become less effective, the rate of offence will increase and more budgets will be needed for education.
Obviously, I give a green light to those believing that students should not be involved in teaching because of three important reasons. One is that following this method, the quality of education can drop. Definitely, rules are extremely important for controlling of students because many of them do not have enough experience about teaching, reducing the educational performance thoroughly. For example, had our principal allowed us to give our opinion about practical physic lessons, we would not have learned the detail of them. We understood that our physic trainer had been one of the best ones in this course; however, had we allowed to have challenges with him, we would have missed him.
Another reason behind it is that the rate of violence can increase markedly. Students feel more freedom in other aspects of their life when their opinions are valued in this area, and their behaviours will become less controllable. This group can become more aggressive in the workplace, university or even in their relations to other citizens. However, when they face some restrictions during this stage in their life, they become more probable law-abiding citizens. Lastly, the cost of education can increase. Admittedly, this method of education will become more costlybecause students always consider the quality of teaching, while the expenses must be included in the new changes. For instance, if an instructor, having one-year training contract, is banned by students to teach them, he will receive the total salary. Authorities usually consider all aspects of education, including finance, and budget.
In conclusion, although some people might agree that students’ opinions should be valued by authorities, I personally believe that this is not a perfect method. Having a better control by the administration, the rate of violation among students and education expenses will decrease, and authorities will have a better control on the efficacy of training system.
Bài viết trên hy vọng cung cấp đầy đủ thông tin cho bạn về Cách viết IELTS Writing Task 2 và một sô bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 chủ đề Education cực hay từ thầy Simon!
